Guidelines for New Mobile Connections.

   Department of Telecom (DoT) has issued revised instructions to Cellular Mobile Telephone Service and Unified Access Services Licensees vide letter dated 09.08.2012 on verification of Mobile Subscribers after review of existing instructions. New instructions are aimed at improving customer verification compliance. These instructions inter-alia prescribe the following:

   (i)    A passport size photograph should be pasted on the Customer Acquisition Form (CAF) and the documents as proof of identity and proof of address of the subscriber should be attached with the CAF.

   (ii)    The person at the Point of Sale has to get the CAF duly filled and signed (in case of illiterate person thumb impression) by the subscriber with date. The authorized person at PoS has to record in the CAF that he has seen the subscriber and matched the photograph attached on the CAF with the subscriber and verified his copies of documents of proof of address and proof of identity attached with the CAF with the original and has to put his signature on the CAF & all attached documents.

   (iii)    The mobile connection is to be activated only after the requirement of filling up CAF and copies of documentary proof as per requirement have been fulfilled by the customer and the subscriber details have been updated in the subscriber database of the Licensee and the employee of licensee has verified the same.

   (iv)    After activation of SIM also the subscriber is to be tele-verified by the Licensee.

   As far as retailers are concerned, they are contractors of the licensees and these instructions are not addressed to the retailers.

   The detailed instructions dated 09.08.2012 are available at DoT website at http: //www.dot.gov.in/as/2012/DOC181012.pdf

   In these instructions, apart from the penalties prescribed in other instructions issued form time to time, the following additional provisions of penalty have inter-alia been made in these instructions:

   (i)    In case, the Licensee fails to intimate about the disconnection to TERM Cell within 7 days of disconnection, a penalty of Rs. 3000/- per connection per week or part thereof shall be levied.

   (ii)    If it is detected that the number was not actually disconnected on or before the date of confirmation/disconnection, then a penalty @ Rs. 1000 per day from the date of intimation to the Licensee to the date of actual disconnection shall be levied in addition to the penalty for non-disconnection.

   The following provisions have inter-alia been re-iterated in these instructions regarding point of sale/ franchisees in case of forged document cases:

   (i)    Police complaint/ FIR shall be lodged by the Point of Sale (PoS)/Franchisee against the subscriber in case forged documents are submitted by the subscriber and originals are also forged.

   (ii)    Licensee shall lodge FIR/ Complaint against the subscriber and Franchisee/PoS in case of failure of PoS/Franchisee in lodging complaint/FIR against subscriber.

   (iii)    The Licensee shall lodge the compliant / FIR against the Franchisee/ point of sale and financial penalty shall also be imposed in case forgery has been done by point of sale/ franchisee.

   (iv)    In case action as above is not taken by the Licensee or Licensee itself is involved in forgery, Telecom Enforcement Resource & Monitoring (TERM) Cell of DoT shall lodge Complaint/ FIR against Licensee. Penalty shall also be imposed on all such forged cases.

   (v)    Where it is found that the act of issuing connections was done by PoS using the document of some other subscriber or any person, or the documents were forged by the franchisee/PoS, the concerned PoS/franchisee may be terminated by the Licensee in addition to lodging of complaint / FIR against it. Other Licensees shall also terminate/ not appoint any such PoS.

   In the new instructions, some additional safeguards have been made in the interest of national security. There does not seem any provision leading to undue hardship to consumers.

   This information was given by Shri Milind Deora, Minister of State for C&IT in a written reply to a question in Lok Sabha today.

whether the ACRs of SC/ST employees of Central Government and PSUs are graded as good and fair only?

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
LOK SABHA

UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 1446

ANSWERED ON 06.03.2013

TRANSPARENT ACRS PROCESS

1446 .    Dr. SOLANKI KIRITBHAI PREMAJIBHAI

   Will the Minister of PERSONNEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS be pleased to state:-

   (a) whether the ACRs of SC/ST employees of Central Government and PSUs are graded as good and fair only;

   (b) if so, the extent to which their promotion opportunities have been affected as a result thereof;

   (c) whether the Government proposes to formulate a transparent process in ACRs especially for the SC/ST employees; and

   (d) if so, the details thereof and if not, the corrective measures taken by the Government to ensure justice to the SC/ST employees?

ANSWER

   Minister of State in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office. (SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY)

   (a): No, Madam.

   (b): In view of above, question does not arise.

   (c) & (d): Government instructions already provide for communicating full ACR (nomenclature now modified as Annual Performance Assessment Report (APAR)/ Performance Appraisal Report (PAR) to all officers/employees. The object is to give an opportunity to the public servant to improve the performance and to make Performance Appraisal System more consultative and transparent. All officers/employees are given the opportunity to make representation against the entries and the final grading given in the Report.

Source:http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/psearch/QResult15.aspx?qref=135937

SEVENTH PAY COMMISSION MUST BE SET UP FORTHWITH

   The recent statement of the Minister concerned in the Parliament, that the Govt. does not propose to set up the seventh Pay Commission at this stage is most unjustified and frustrating for the Govt. employees.
 
   Fifth Pay Commission had recommended for a Pay Revision after every five years instead of the past practice to set it up after 10 to 13 years. But the Govt. did not accept this recommendation.

   The Fifth Pay Commission also recommended for Merger of DA after it crossed 50%. Govt. accepted the same and belatedly implemented it from April 2004.

   But the Sixth Pay Commission did not favour even the Merger of DA after it crossed 50% and the Govt. obvious followed suit and did not Merge the same when it crossed 50% in 1-1-2011 - in spite of the demand by all concerned.

   As such, the existing Pay and Pension structure have lost all the relevance and is continuously eroding due to heavy inflation and defective system of compilation of Price Index - which itself is out dated due to the changed economic scenario and requirements of the Industrial Worker of the Country.

   All this makes it essential that the Seventh Pay Commission be set up early to compensate for the erosion of real wages and to remove the serious Anomalies of Sixth CPC Report - which the Govt. and the Anomalies Committee have failed to address as well as to bridge the vast gap of wages between the Government employees and those of the Corporate Sector etc. all which are having a very demoralising effect amongst the Govt. employees and Pensioners.

Er. HARCHANDAN SINGH
General Secretary, IRTSA.

Source:http://www.irtsa.net/pdfdocs/Seventh_Pay_Commission_Must_Be-Set_Up.pdf